Amid the ongoing legal battle between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, the drama continues to unfold in the French winery case at Château Miraval. Brad Pitt’s lawyers have now retaliated against Jolie’s recent abuse claims by demanding transparency regarding the number of gag orders or confidentiality agreements she has imposed on her staff.
The latest court ruling favored Pitt, allowing him to challenge Jolie for allegedly breaching the “first refusal” agreement. A source close to Pitt has dismissed Jolie’s abuse claims as a mere distraction tactic in the escalating legal dispute.
In addition to the physical abuse allegations, Jolie’s legal team has accused Pitt of restricting her from selling her shares in the winery without signing a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Pitt’s lawyers are now seeking to prove that the NDA requested by Pitt was not more restrictive than those routinely demanded by Jolie from others.
Furthermore, Pitt’s legal team highlights that Jolie proposed a comprehensive mutual nondisparagement agreement within six months of selling her Miraval shares during the divorce proceedings. They suggest that Jolie’s behavior towards third parties in terms of confidentiality agreements could shed light on her true intentions regarding the NDA in question.
A source close to Pitt has emphasized that the focus of the case is not on the alleged physical abuse in 2016 but rather on the agreement regarding the winery and family home interests. As the legal battle continues to unfold, the truth behind these allegations remains to be seen.
With each new development in the case, the stakes are getting higher for both parties involved. Stay tuned for more updates on this high-profile Hollywood dispute.
